Offensive Security · Web AppSec
Find it in an exercise, not in a breach.
OWASP WSTG and OWASP Top 10 aligned web application penetration testing — manual and automated, with proof-of-exploit.
Automated scanners find the low-hanging fruit. Real risk lives in business-logic abuse, chained vulnerabilities and privilege boundaries. Our web application pentests follow OWASP WSTG methodology — combining automation with senior manual testing — and deliver reports with clear proof-of-exploit and prioritised remediation.
/ Capabilities
What's in scope.
OWASP Top 10 & WSTG
Full coverage of injection, auth, access control, SSRF, deserialisation and cryptographic issues per OWASP WSTG.
Business-logic testing
Manual testing for privilege escalation, workflow abuse, price manipulation and race conditions that scanners miss.
Authenticated multi-role testing
Testing across roles, tenants and privilege boundaries to surface horizontal and vertical access-control flaws.
Proof-of-exploit reporting
Reproducible steps, CVSS-scored findings and clear remediation guidance for engineering.
Scanners are a starting point, not a report.
We use automation for coverage and speed, then senior testers spend the majority of the engagement on manual, chained and business-logic exploration — where real risk lives.
Retest at no extra cost.
A pentest with no retest is a snapshot. Every engagement includes a fix-verification retest so 'remediated' means 'proven remediated'.
/ Standards & Tooling
/ References & standards
Every claim on this page is sourced.
These are the public, authoritative sources this page draws from. If a statement isn't backed by one of the standards, tools or policies below, it isn't on the page.
- [1]OWASP Web Security Testing Guide (WSTG) v4.2— OWASP Foundation
- [2]OWASP Top 10 (2021)— OWASP Foundation
- [3]CVSS v4.0 Specification— FIRST.org
- [4]NIST SP 800-115 — Technical Guide to Information Security Testing— NIST
/ Editorial accuracy checklist
What we confirmed before publishing.
A short list of internal checks every offensive-security page must pass before it goes live. If you spot a gap, email info@solvin.co.in and we'll correct it.
- Every standard, framework and tool named on this page has a citation in the References section below.
- No customer names, logos, case studies or metrics are used unless explicitly authorised in writing.
- No vendor product claims are made beyond what the vendor publishes in official documentation.
- Statistics and percentages are attributed to their source or omitted; illustrative figures are labelled as such.
- Cloud-provider testing policy statements reflect the provider's published rules of engagement at time of writing.
- Content is reviewed annually and after any material change to a referenced standard.
Common questions.
Black-box, grey-box or white-box?
Grey-box gives the best ROI for most applications — credentials for each role are provided so testers reach depth in the time available. Black-box suits pre-launch adversary simulation; white-box suits critical assurance.
How long is a typical engagement?
A mid-complexity SaaS application typically takes 8-12 working days plus a retest window. Large multi-tenant platforms run in phases scoped by area.
Ready to scope a web application penetration testing engagement?
A senior practitioner — not a sales rep — will respond within one business day.
Contact Us