Cybersecurity · Zero Trust

Never trust. Always verify.

Design and roll out a Zero Trust programme aligned to NIST SP 800-207 — verify explicitly, use least privilege, and assume breach.

We help enterprises move from perimeter-based defence to a NIST SP 800-207 aligned Zero Trust Architecture — where every access decision considers user identity, device posture, workload sensitivity and behavioural context. Our engagements cover current-state assessment, target-state architecture, and phased implementation across ZTNA, micro-segmentation, conditional access and continuous verification.

NIST
800-207 aligned
CISA
Maturity Model 2.0
5
Pillars covered

/ Capabilities

What's in scope.

Zero Trust maturity assessment

Baseline your programme against CISA Zero Trust Maturity Model 2.0 across Identity, Devices, Networks, Applications and Data pillars.

Reference architecture & design

Target-state architecture aligned to NIST SP 800-207 with PDP/PEP placement, policy taxonomy and telemetry strategy.

ZTNA & micro-segmentation rollout

Replace VPN with identity-aware ZTNA and segment east-west traffic in the data centre and cloud.

Continuous verification

Adaptive policies driven by device posture, risk score and session telemetry, not static IP allowlists.

A pragmatic path to Zero Trust.

Zero Trust is a programme, not a product. We sequence work so early wins — MFA-everywhere, conditional access, ZTNA for third parties — precede deeper efforts like workload identity and micro-segmentation.

  • Identity-first: strong authentication, PAM, and workload identity
  • Device posture as an access signal (managed, compliant, healthy)
  • Application-layer access via ZTNA — no flat network trust
  • Data-centric controls: classification, DLP and encryption in use

Governance and telemetry.

We codify policy in a version-controlled repository, publish decision-audit trails to the SIEM, and provide dashboards mapped to CISA maturity levels so executives can see progress over time.

/ Standards & Tooling

NIST SP 800-207CISA ZTMM 2.0Entra ID / OktaZscaler / NetskopeIllumio / Cisco Secure WorkloadCrowdStrike / Intune posture

Common questions.

Do we need to replace our firewalls?

No. Zero Trust reduces reliance on network location for trust, but firewalls remain useful for egress control and macro-segmentation. The shift is toward identity-aware, per-session policy at the application layer.

How long does a typical roadmap take?

Foundational wins (MFA, conditional access, ZTNA for third parties) usually land in 3-6 months. Full micro-segmentation and workload identity across a large estate is a 12-24 month programme executed in waves.

Is Zero Trust the same as SASE?

SASE is one delivery model that packages ZTNA, SWG, CASB and SD-WAN. Zero Trust is the architectural principle. A SASE platform can accelerate ZTA adoption but does not by itself deliver it.

Ready to scope a zero trust architecture engagement?

A senior practitioner — not a sales rep — will respond within one business day.

Contact Us